How To Choose Capsule Polisher for Capsule Filling Machine

Views: 5     Author: Hunan Grand packing machinery     Publish Time: 2025-07-17      Origin: Hunan Grand Packing Machinery

Vertical and Horizontal Capsule Polishing Machines Selection Guide

Introduction

In the pharmaceutical industry, capsule polishing machines are indispensable post-processing equipment in capsule filling production lines, used to remove dust and fine particles from capsule surfaces and improve product appearance quality. Selecting the appropriate capsule polishing machine is crucial for ensuring production efficiency, product quality, and GMP compliance. This article provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal capsule polishing machines from multiple dimensions including structural design, connectivity adaptability, functional configuration, and material selection, offering professional guidance for pharmaceutical companies when selecting polishing machines to pair with capsule filling machines.

Vertical Polisher and Horizontal Polisher

I. Structural Design Comparison

1. Vertical Capsule Polishing Machine

Vertical capsule polishing machines feature a vertically oriented design where capsules pass through the polishing area from top to bottom under gravity. Key characteristics include:

  • Compact structure: Small footprint, suitable for pharmaceutical workshops with limited space

  • Simple and reliable: Relatively simple mechanical structure with low failure rate

  • Gravity utilization: Uses capsule weight for downward movement, resulting in lower energy consumption


2. Horizontal Capsule Polishing Machine

Horizontal capsule polishing machines employ a horizontally oriented design where capsules move through the polishing area horizontally via conveyor belts or screw propulsion. Key characteristics include:

  • High processing capacity: Suitable for high-volume production lines

  • Uniform polishing: Longer horizontal polishing path for capsules

  • High flexibility: Easier to connect with other horizontally arranged equipment


II. Comparison of Standalone and Connected Operation Suitability

  1. Suitability for Standalone Operation

 

  • Vertical Polishing Machine:

    • More suitable as an independent unit

    • Appropriate for small-to-medium batch production or pilot lines

    • Relatively easier cleaning during product changeovers

    • Requires precise height matching when connecting to other equipment

  • Horizontal Polishing Machine:

    • Can operate as a standalone unit but doesn't fully utilize efficiency advantages

    • Better suited for large-volume single-product production

    • Relatively more complex cleaning, especially for internal conveying mechanisms

      JFP100D structure diagram

  • Horizontal Polishing Machine:

    • Can operate as a standalone unit but doesn't fully utilize efficiency advantages

    • Better suited for large-volume single-product production

    • Relatively more complex cleaning, especially for internal conveying mechanisms

      JFP110A structure diagram

    III. Functional Configuration Comparison

    1. Polishing-Only Function

    • Vertical Polishing Machine:

      • Basic models typically offer polishing and sorting function

      • Uses brushes or air flow to remove surface dust

      • Simple structure with easy maintenance

    • Horizontal Polishing Machine:

      • Basic models focus mainly on polishing

      Comparison-of-Polisher-with-sorter-and-poliser-without-sorter

    2. Polishing with Sorting Function

    • Vertical Combined Polishing-Sorting Machine:

      • Typically adds sorting module after polishing

      • Sorting often based on weight

      • Structure becomes relatively more complex

      • Suitable for applications with special sorting requirements

    • Horizontal Combined Polishing-Sorting Machine:

      • Modular design allows flexible configuration

      • Suitable for high-standard automated production lines

    Function Selection Recommendations:

    • For basic polishing needs, both types can suffice

    • When integrated sorting is required, horizontal combined machines typically offer more advantages

    • Special sorting requirements (e.g., weight sorting) may require customized vertical models


    IV. Material Selection Comparison

    1. 304 Stainless Steel

    • Application Characteristics:

      • Good corrosion resistance

      • Lower cost

      • Meets general pharmaceutical requirements

      • Suitable for most oral solid dosage forms

    • Applicable Scenarios:

      • Non-highly corrosive environments

      • Budget-constrained projects

      • Conventional drug production

    2. 316 Stainless Steel

    • Application Characteristics:

      • Higher corrosion resistance

      • Particularly resistant to chloride corrosion

      • Smoother surface for easier cleaning

      • Complies with higher GMP standards

    • Applicable Scenarios:

      • High humidity or corrosive environments

      • Special formulations or highly active drugs

      • Production lines requiring international GMP certification

      • When long-term equipment durability is prioritized

    Material Selection Recommendations:

    • For conventional oral solid dosage forms, 304 material is sufficient

    • For special environments or high-requirement products, choose 316 material

    • Parts in direct product contact should use at least 316 material

    • When budget allows, prioritize higher material standards

    V. Other Key Selection Considerations

    1. Production Capacity Matching

    • Select polishing machine capacity based on capsule filling machine's maximum output

    • Consider potential future capacity increases

    • Vertical models typically capacity (150,000-400,000 capsules/hour)

    • Horizontal models capacity (200,000-350,000 capsules/hour)

    2. Capsule Specification Adaptability

    • Confirm equipment supports all planned capsule sizes

    • Check ease of specification changeover

    • Vertical models typically allow quicker changeovers

    • Horizontal models may require more adjustments

    3. Cleaning and Maintenance

    • Check for hard-to-clean dead spaces

    • Vertical models are typically easier to clean manually

    • Horizontal models may require more specialized cleaning procedures

    4. Compliance Requirements

    • Confirm compliance with latest GMP requirements

    • Check completeness of validation documentation

    • Evaluate data recording and traceability functions

    • Both types can meet basic GMP, but implementation differs

    5. Cost Considerations

    • Initial investment cost: Horizontal typically lower than Vertical

    • Operating costs: Consider energy consumption, maintenance, consumables

    • Lifecycle cost: Include durability and upgrade potential

    • Connectivity costs: Include interface equipment and modification expenses

    VI. Typical Case Studies

    Case 1: Small-to-Medium Pharmaceutical Company

    • Requirements:

      • Capacity: 50,000 capsules/hour

      • Multi-product production

      • Limited space

      • Moderate budget

    • Recommended Solution:

      • Horizontal capsule polishing machine

      • 304 main body with 316 contact parts

      • Basic polishing function

      • Reserve interface for future sorting module

    Case 2: Large Pharmaceutical Company Building New Production Line

    • Requirements:

      • Capacity: 350,000 capsules/hour

      • High automation requirements

      • Planning for international GMP certification

      • Long-term continuous operation

    • Recommended Solution:

      • Vertical capsule polishing machine

      • Full 316 stainless steel construction

      • Integrated sorting function

      • Complete connected automation design

    Conclusion

    Vertical and horizontal capsule polishing machines each have their advantages and suitable applications. Pharmaceutical companies should consider the following key factors when selecting:

    1. Production Requirements: Including capacity, product variety, and connectivity needs

    2. Space Layout: Existing or planned production line layout

    3. Functional Requirements: Basic polishing or need for integrated functions

    4. Compliance Standards: Required GMP level and certifications

    5. Budget Constraints: Balance between initial investment and long-term operating costs

      Height-of-polishing-inlet-and-outlet

    Generally, Generally speaking, the vertical capsule polisher is more popular because of its higher inlet and outlet height (easy to connect the front and rear end equipment), smaller footprint, better polishing quality and the vertical structure design which makes the brush more durable. The horizontal capsule polishing machine is chosen by many old buyers because of its lower price and longer use habits (longer time on the market). Material selection should be based on product characteristics and compliance requirements, with higher-grade materials recommended when budget allows to ensure long-term reliability and compliance.

    Selection of Vacuum Cleaner for Capsule Polisher

    Final selection decisions should be based on comprehensive needs analysis and compatibility assessment with existing or planned capsule filling machines. Hunan Grand Packing Machinery can be consulted for customized solutions when necessary.


    More details,pls contact us!

    Ava Duan

    Email: sales@grand-packing.com

    whatsapp/wechat:86-13787413551


    Contact Us

    Mob: +86-13706885851
             +86-13787413551
     Tel:   +86-731-84325468
     Fax:  
    +86-731-84325498
    Ask your questions by E-mail
    sales@grand-packing.com

    Language Options

    Français              العربية               Pусский
    Español          Português             한국어
    Tiếng Việt            ไทย                Türk dili
    Melayu           Bahasa indonesia
    Request A Quote